Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudicatory order. The Tribunal held that the exemption notification does not impose a condition that exported jewellery must be manufactured exclusively from imported gold; the show cause notice and adjudication erred by importing instructions from a CBEC circular into the notification. The Tribunal noted the FTP permits duty-free procurement of gold either in advance or as replenishment and that a Board circular constitutes administrative instruction to officers, not a legislative condition. Consequently the demand of duty, interest and penalties premised on the misconceived reading of the circular was unsustainable and was quashed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudicatory order. The Tribunal held that the exemption notification does not impose a condition that exported jewellery must be manufactured exclusively from imported gold; the show cause notice and adjudication erred by importing instructions from a CBEC circular into the notification. The Tribunal noted the FTP permits duty-free procurement of gold either in advance or as replenishment and that a Board circular constitutes administrative instruction to officers, not a legislative condition. Consequently the demand of duty, interest and penalties premised on the misconceived reading of the circular was unsustainable and was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.