<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal quashes duty demands, rules exemption allowing jewellery from domestic or imported gold; circular can&#039;t add conditions</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92341</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudicatory order. The Tribunal held that the exemption notification does not impose a condition that exported jewellery must be manufactured exclusively from imported gold; the show cause notice and adjudication erred by importing instructions from a CBEC circular into the notification. The Tribunal noted the FTP permits duty-free procurement of gold either in advance or as replenishment and that a Board circular constitutes administrative instruction to officers, not a legislative condition. Consequently the demand of duty, interest and penalties premised on the misconceived reading of the circular was unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal quashes duty demands, rules exemption allowing jewellery from domestic or imported gold; circular can&#039;t add conditions</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92341</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudicatory order. The Tribunal held that the exemption notification does not impose a condition that exported jewellery must be manufactured exclusively from imported gold; the show cause notice and adjudication erred by importing instructions from a CBEC circular into the notification. The Tribunal noted the FTP permits duty-free procurement of gold either in advance or as replenishment and that a Board circular constitutes administrative instruction to officers, not a legislative condition. Consequently the demand of duty, interest and penalties premised on the misconceived reading of the circular was unsustainable and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>