Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's approval of the resolution plan. The Tribunal held pre-CIRP valuations irrelevant; only the RP's post-CIRP valuation by registered valuers governs valuation, and the RP procured valuations in compliance with the Code and Regulations. The Appellant's failure to furnish documents to the RP undermined his challenge. The Appellant, as a suspended director/ex-promoter, lacks locus to contest approval of the resolution plan, and cannot rely on pre-CIRP valuation reports to impugn the plan. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the application approving the resolution plan was correctly allowed and the appeal was dismissed.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's approval of the resolution plan. The Tribunal held pre-CIRP valuations irrelevant; only the RP's post-CIRP valuation by registered valuers governs valuation, and the RP procured valuations in compliance with the Code and Regulations. The Appellant's failure to furnish documents to the RP undermined his challenge. The Appellant, as a suspended director/ex-promoter, lacks locus to contest approval of the resolution plan, and cannot rely on pre-CIRP valuation reports to impugn the plan. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the application approving the resolution plan was correctly allowed and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.