<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal dismissed; resolution plan approval upheld as RP&#039;s post-CIRP valuations by registered valuers govern and appellant lacks locus</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92338</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA&#039;s approval of the resolution plan. The Tribunal held pre-CIRP valuations irrelevant; only the RP&#039;s post-CIRP valuation by registered valuers governs valuation, and the RP procured valuations in compliance with the Code and Regulations. The Appellant&#039;s failure to furnish documents to the RP undermined his challenge. The Appellant, as a suspended director/ex-promoter, lacks locus to contest approval of the resolution plan, and cannot rely on pre-CIRP valuation reports to impugn the plan. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the application approving the resolution plan was correctly allowed and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal dismissed; resolution plan approval upheld as RP&#039;s post-CIRP valuations by registered valuers govern and appellant lacks locus</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92338</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA&#039;s approval of the resolution plan. The Tribunal held pre-CIRP valuations irrelevant; only the RP&#039;s post-CIRP valuation by registered valuers governs valuation, and the RP procured valuations in compliance with the Code and Regulations. The Appellant&#039;s failure to furnish documents to the RP undermined his challenge. The Appellant, as a suspended director/ex-promoter, lacks locus to contest approval of the resolution plan, and cannot rely on pre-CIRP valuation reports to impugn the plan. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the application approving the resolution plan was correctly allowed and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>