Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, holding that amounts paid to the seller were subject to tax deduction at source at 3.12% in accordance with the lower deduction certificate issued under section 197. The Tribunal found no short deduction of TDS, noting that a co-purchaser had identical documentation and that a prior NFAC order adopting the same conclusion in respect of the same seller remained unchallenged by the revenue. Differential treatment was therefore impermissible. Consequential addition for alleged short deduction was deleted and the appellant's deduction practice was held to be in compliance with statutory requirements; appeal allowed.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, holding that amounts paid to the seller were subject to tax deduction at source at 3.12% in accordance with the lower deduction certificate issued under section 197. The Tribunal found no short deduction of TDS, noting that a co-purchaser had identical documentation and that a prior NFAC order adopting the same conclusion in respect of the same seller remained unchallenged by the revenue. Differential treatment was therefore impermissible. Consequential addition for alleged short deduction was deleted and the appellant's deduction practice was held to be in compliance with statutory requirements; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.