Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, holding that amounts paid to the seller were subject to tax deduction at source at 3.12% in accordance with the lower deduction certificate issued under section 197. The Tribunal found no short deduction of TDS, noting that a co-purchaser had identical documentation and that a prior NFAC order adopting the same conclusion in respect of the same seller remained unchallenged by the revenue. Differential treatment was therefore impermissible. Consequential addition for alleged short deduction was deleted and the appellant's deduction practice was held to be in compliance with statutory requirements; appeal allowed.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, holding that amounts paid to the seller were subject to tax deduction at source at 3.12% in accordance with the lower deduction certificate issued under section 197. The Tribunal found no short deduction of TDS, noting that a co-purchaser had identical documentation and that a prior NFAC order adopting the same conclusion in respect of the same seller remained unchallenged by the revenue. Differential treatment was therefore impermissible. Consequential addition for alleged short deduction was deleted and the appellant's deduction practice was held to be in compliance with statutory requirements; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.