Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, holding that amounts paid to the seller were subject to tax deduction at source at 3.12% in accordance with the lower deduction certificate issued under section 197. The Tribunal found no short deduction of TDS, noting that a co-purchaser had identical documentation and that a prior NFAC order adopting the same conclusion in respect of the same seller remained unchallenged by the revenue. Differential treatment was therefore impermissible. Consequential addition for alleged short deduction was deleted and the appellant's deduction practice was held to be in compliance with statutory requirements; appeal allowed.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, holding that amounts paid to the seller were subject to tax deduction at source at 3.12% in accordance with the lower deduction certificate issued under section 197. The Tribunal found no short deduction of TDS, noting that a co-purchaser had identical documentation and that a prior NFAC order adopting the same conclusion in respect of the same seller remained unchallenged by the revenue. Differential treatment was therefore impermissible. Consequential addition for alleged short deduction was deleted and the appellant's deduction practice was held to be in compliance with statutory requirements; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
