Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
State tax department directs strict procedures for assessing whether to file appeals or revisions against appellate tribunal orders that prejudice revenue, requiring assessing and intelligence officers to scrutinize orders for erroneous decisions or unresolved questions of law, prepare fact-based, reasoned remarks, obtain in-house legal views where needed, and submit those remarks to supervisory Joint Commissioners for second-level evaluation before transmission to the Joint Commissioner (Law). Remarks must include a concise order summary, legal evaluation emphasizing error or question of law, and a reasoned recommendation on appeal; approved revisions will be monitored through the court process. These instructions take immediate effect.
State tax department directs strict procedures for assessing whether to file appeals or revisions against appellate tribunal orders that prejudice revenue, requiring assessing and intelligence officers to scrutinize orders for erroneous decisions or unresolved questions of law, prepare fact-based, reasoned remarks, obtain in-house legal views where needed, and submit those remarks to supervisory Joint Commissioners for second-level evaluation before transmission to the Joint Commissioner (Law). Remarks must include a concise order summary, legal evaluation emphasizing error or question of law, and a reasoned recommendation on appeal; approved revisions will be monitored through the court process. These instructions take immediate effect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.