Instructions issued by Kerala SGST Department - Regarding filing appeal against the orders of AIT&ST/KVAT Appellate Tribunal-scrutiny and submission of remarks by the jurisdictional officers and supervisory officers.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Scope for filing revision: examine tribunal orders for erroneous decisions or undetermined questions of law and prepare reasoned remarks. Assessing and intelligence officers must scrutinize appellate Tribunal orders prejudicial to revenue for erroneous decisions or failure to decide a question of law, prepare fact based, reasoned remarks supported by statutory analysis and legal opinion where necessary, and submit those remarks for second level verification to the District Joint Commissioner or Joint Commissioner (Intelligence & Enforcement) before transmission to the Joint Commissioner (Law); Joint Commissioners must ensure sufficiency of remarks and, if revision is approved, monitor filing and progress before the High Court.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Scope for filing revision: examine tribunal orders for erroneous decisions or undetermined questions of law and prepare reasoned remarks.
Assessing and intelligence officers must scrutinize appellate Tribunal orders prejudicial to revenue for erroneous decisions or failure to decide a question of law, prepare fact based, reasoned remarks supported by statutory analysis and legal opinion where necessary, and submit those remarks for second level verification to the District Joint Commissioner or Joint Commissioner (Intelligence & Enforcement) before transmission to the Joint Commissioner (Law); Joint Commissioners must ensure sufficiency of remarks and, if revision is approved, monitor filing and progress before the High Court.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.