Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue's SLP for delay and on the merits, thereby affirming the High Court's order directing the Revenue to grant interest under section 244A on the refund from the date of TDS deposit until payment, to be completed within 12 weeks. Facts: compensation for acquisition of petitioners' agricultural land attracted interest; assessee's belated return was condoned under section 119(2)(b); tax was deducted under an incorrect provision (section 194C instead of section 194A). The SLP was held to be barred by an unexplained 398-day delay and lacked substantive merit, so the HC relief in favor of the assessee is sustained.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue's SLP for delay and on the merits, thereby affirming the High Court's order directing the Revenue to grant interest under section 244A on the refund from the date of TDS deposit until payment, to be completed within 12 weeks. Facts: compensation for acquisition of petitioners' agricultural land attracted interest; assessee's belated return was condoned under section 119(2)(b); tax was deducted under an incorrect provision (section 194C instead of section 194A). The SLP was held to be barred by an unexplained 398-day delay and lacked substantive merit, so the HC relief in favor of the assessee is sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
