<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue ordered to pay interest under Section 244A on TDS refund from deposit to payment; delay condoned under Section 119(2)(b)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92252</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s SLP for delay and on the merits, thereby affirming the High Court&#039;s order directing the Revenue to grant interest under section 244A on the refund from the date of TDS deposit until payment, to be completed within 12 weeks. Facts: compensation for acquisition of petitioners&#039; agricultural land attracted interest; assessee&#039;s belated return was condoned under section 119(2)(b); tax was deducted under an incorrect provision (section 194C instead of section 194A). The SLP was held to be barred by an unexplained 398-day delay and lacked substantive merit, so the HC relief in favor of the assessee is sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue ordered to pay interest under Section 244A on TDS refund from deposit to payment; delay condoned under Section 119(2)(b)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92252</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s SLP for delay and on the merits, thereby affirming the High Court&#039;s order directing the Revenue to grant interest under section 244A on the refund from the date of TDS deposit until payment, to be completed within 12 weeks. Facts: compensation for acquisition of petitioners&#039; agricultural land attracted interest; assessee&#039;s belated return was condoned under section 119(2)(b); tax was deducted under an incorrect provision (section 194C instead of section 194A). The SLP was held to be barred by an unexplained 398-day delay and lacked substantive merit, so the HC relief in favor of the assessee is sustained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>