Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
The HC found the Appellate Authority's order rendered without proper consideration of extant HC orders on the record and characterized the officers' affidavit as evasive and nonresponsive, noting admission of a prior writ order without explanation for non-compliance. The court adjourned the matter to 09.09.2025, conditional upon payment of Rs.5,000 by deduction from the salary of the respondent-officer who issued the impugned order, payable to the petitioner before the next date. The Principal Secretary, Institutional Finance, U.P. (respondent no.1), was directed to file a personal affidavit explaining the conduct of the State officers in failing to follow the writ court's orders.
The HC found the Appellate Authority's order rendered without proper consideration of extant HC orders on the record and characterized the officers' affidavit as evasive and nonresponsive, noting admission of a prior writ order without explanation for non-compliance. The court adjourned the matter to 09.09.2025, conditional upon payment of Rs.5,000 by deduction from the salary of the respondent-officer who issued the impugned order, payable to the petitioner before the next date. The Principal Secretary, Institutional Finance, U.P. (respondent no.1), was directed to file a personal affidavit explaining the conduct of the State officers in failing to follow the writ court's orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
