Judicial compliance and officer update mechanisms required further explanation, with additional affidavits and administrative directions ordered.

Non-compliance with an earlier writ court order remained unexplained in the respondents' affidavit, so the Court called for a better affidavit from the Principal Secretary, Institutional Finance. It also directed administrative measures to ensure officers are regularly updated on recent judicial pronouncements through a structured road map. The matter was adjourned, costs were ordered to be paid before the next date, and further affidavits were required to address compliance and implementation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the respondents had complied with earlier judicial pronouncements while passing the impugned appellate order, and whether the matter required further explanation and directions for future compliance.

Analysis: The affidavit placed by the respondents did not satisfactorily explain why the earlier writ court order was not followed while deciding the appeal. The Court therefore required a better affidavit from the Principal Secretary, Institutional Finance, and also directed steps to ensure that officers are kept updated about recent judicial pronouncements through a structured road map.

Outcome: The matter was adjourned, costs were directed to be paid before the next date, and additional affidavits and administrative directions were ordered.

---