Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned execution order. The Court held that where interest exceeds Rs.50,000 in a financial year, TDS is mandatorily deductible; here the aggregate interest was Rs.3,90,700 and each claimant's share exceeded Rs.50,000, thus the petitioner's 20% TDS deduction was lawful. The executing court erred in directing refund of Rs.78,150 to the claimants. The impugned order of the ADJ is unsustainable and is vacated. The claimants remain at liberty to pursue any refund remedy before the Income Tax Department in accordance with statutory procedure.
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned execution order. The Court held that where interest exceeds Rs.50,000 in a financial year, TDS is mandatorily deductible; here the aggregate interest was Rs.3,90,700 and each claimant's share exceeded Rs.50,000, thus the petitioner's 20% TDS deduction was lawful. The executing court erred in directing refund of Rs.78,150 to the claimants. The impugned order of the ADJ is unsustainable and is vacated. The claimants remain at liberty to pursue any refund remedy before the Income Tax Department in accordance with statutory procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
