Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT held that the reassessment initiated under s.148 was invalid because the assessee complied with all notices and there was no suppression of material facts warranting reopening; consequently the reassessment proceedings are non est. Having found the reassessment void ab initio, the revisionary order passed by the AO under s.263 lacks jurisdiction and is set aside. The appeal by the assessee is allowed, with directions that no addition on account of alleged bogus expenditure or interest under s.234A for the specified period shall be sustained pursuant to the impugned proceedings. The AO is precluded from pursuing the contested reassessment and revision further.
The ITAT held that the reassessment initiated under s.148 was invalid because the assessee complied with all notices and there was no suppression of material facts warranting reopening; consequently the reassessment proceedings are non est. Having found the reassessment void ab initio, the revisionary order passed by the AO under s.263 lacks jurisdiction and is set aside. The appeal by the assessee is allowed, with directions that no addition on account of alleged bogus expenditure or interest under s.234A for the specified period shall be sustained pursuant to the impugned proceedings. The AO is precluded from pursuing the contested reassessment and revision further.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
