Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT held that the reassessment initiated under s.148 was invalid because the assessee complied with all notices and there was no suppression of material facts warranting reopening; consequently the reassessment proceedings are non est. Having found the reassessment void ab initio, the revisionary order passed by the AO under s.263 lacks jurisdiction and is set aside. The appeal by the assessee is allowed, with directions that no addition on account of alleged bogus expenditure or interest under s.234A for the specified period shall be sustained pursuant to the impugned proceedings. The AO is precluded from pursuing the contested reassessment and revision further.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
