Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The ITAT held that the reassessment initiated under s.148 was invalid because the assessee complied with all notices and there was no suppression of material facts warranting reopening; consequently the reassessment proceedings are non est. Having found the reassessment void ab initio, the revisionary order passed by the AO under s.263 lacks jurisdiction and is set aside. The appeal by the assessee is allowed, with directions that no addition on account of alleged bogus expenditure or interest under s.234A for the specified period shall be sustained pursuant to the impugned proceedings. The AO is precluded from pursuing the contested reassessment and revision further.
The ITAT held that the reassessment initiated under s.148 was invalid because the assessee complied with all notices and there was no suppression of material facts warranting reopening; consequently the reassessment proceedings are non est. Having found the reassessment void ab initio, the revisionary order passed by the AO under s.263 lacks jurisdiction and is set aside. The appeal by the assessee is allowed, with directions that no addition on account of alleged bogus expenditure or interest under s.234A for the specified period shall be sustained pursuant to the impugned proceedings. The AO is precluded from pursuing the contested reassessment and revision further.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
