Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The court found the show-cause notice dated 12.03.2024 legally defective because it afforded a 30-day reply period but fixed an earlier personal hearing within that period, rendering the notice bad in law; the petitioner offered no explanation for non-submission of a written response. Consequently, the HC quashed the 12.03.2024 notice and the consequential order dated 02.05.2024, but expressly left open the respondent's liberty to issue a fresh valid show-cause notice and proceed in accordance with law.
The HC allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The court found the show-cause notice dated 12.03.2024 legally defective because it afforded a 30-day reply period but fixed an earlier personal hearing within that period, rendering the notice bad in law; the petitioner offered no explanation for non-submission of a written response. Consequently, the HC quashed the 12.03.2024 notice and the consequential order dated 02.05.2024, but expressly left open the respondent's liberty to issue a fresh valid show-cause notice and proceed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.