Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The court found no documentary evidence rebutting the competent authority's findings and noted the petitioner failed to disclose any challenge or appeal against the Proper Officer's cancellation order. Consequently, the cancellation stands and a show-cause notice issued under Section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of GST and penalty remains effective. The HC relied on the Apex Court principle that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is inappropriate to supplant statutory remedies in assessment matters and that the petitioner should be relegated to available appellate remedies. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The court found no documentary evidence rebutting the competent authority's findings and noted the petitioner failed to disclose any challenge or appeal against the Proper Officer's cancellation order. Consequently, the cancellation stands and a show-cause notice issued under Section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of GST and penalty remains effective. The HC relied on the Apex Court principle that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is inappropriate to supplant statutory remedies in assessment matters and that the petitioner should be relegated to available appellate remedies. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
