Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The court found no documentary evidence rebutting the competent authority's findings and noted the petitioner failed to disclose any challenge or appeal against the Proper Officer's cancellation order. Consequently, the cancellation stands and a show-cause notice issued under Section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of GST and penalty remains effective. The HC relied on the Apex Court principle that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is inappropriate to supplant statutory remedies in assessment matters and that the petitioner should be relegated to available appellate remedies. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The court found no documentary evidence rebutting the competent authority's findings and noted the petitioner failed to disclose any challenge or appeal against the Proper Officer's cancellation order. Consequently, the cancellation stands and a show-cause notice issued under Section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017 for recovery of GST and penalty remains effective. The HC relied on the Apex Court principle that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is inappropriate to supplant statutory remedies in assessment matters and that the petitioner should be relegated to available appellate remedies. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
