Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claims in part and remitted matters to the Assessing Officer. For A.Y. 2017-18 and A.Y. 2018-19 the Tribunal admitted the claim that export incentives under FPS/MEIS constitute capital receipts and restored the issue to the AO to examine merits, quantify amounts, and decide afresh after hearing the assessee. For A.Ys. 2012-13 to 2016-17 the Tribunal restored the admissibility issue to the AO to determine whether such claims can be entertained in proceedings under s.153A in the absence of incriminating material, permitting the assessee to raise all contentions. On merits the Tribunal held MEIS "rewards" are capital receipts outside s.2(24) and directed deletion of additions treated as revenue income.
ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claims in part and remitted matters to the Assessing Officer. For A.Y. 2017-18 and A.Y. 2018-19 the Tribunal admitted the claim that export incentives under FPS/MEIS constitute capital receipts and restored the issue to the AO to examine merits, quantify amounts, and decide afresh after hearing the assessee. For A.Ys. 2012-13 to 2016-17 the Tribunal restored the admissibility issue to the AO to determine whether such claims can be entertained in proceedings under s.153A in the absence of incriminating material, permitting the assessee to raise all contentions. On merits the Tribunal held MEIS "rewards" are capital receipts outside s.2(24) and directed deletion of additions treated as revenue income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.