Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claims in part and remitted matters to the Assessing Officer. For A.Y. 2017-18 and A.Y. 2018-19 the Tribunal admitted the claim that export incentives under FPS/MEIS constitute capital receipts and restored the issue to the AO to examine merits, quantify amounts, and decide afresh after hearing the assessee. For A.Ys. 2012-13 to 2016-17 the Tribunal restored the admissibility issue to the AO to determine whether such claims can be entertained in proceedings under s.153A in the absence of incriminating material, permitting the assessee to raise all contentions. On merits the Tribunal held MEIS 'rewards' are capital receipts outside s.2(24) and directed deletion of additions treated as revenue income.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
