Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the JAO to rectify the assessment u/s.154 and delete the demand. Tribunal found, on the basis of Form 26AS and a bank certificate, that the TDS was wrongly deducted under s.194A when funds were transferred from a CGAS account to a regular savings account; the bank conceded the error and records showed corresponding entries in the capital gains account and bank statements. The Tribunal held that systemic inability of revenue systems to process an apparent error cannot prejudice the taxpayer and cannot justify sustaining an unjust demand. Consequently the rectification was ordered to be carried out by the assessing officer and the demand raised on the taxpayer was quashed.
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the JAO to rectify the assessment u/s.154 and delete the demand. Tribunal found, on the basis of Form 26AS and a bank certificate, that the TDS was wrongly deducted under s.194A when funds were transferred from a CGAS account to a regular savings account; the bank conceded the error and records showed corresponding entries in the capital gains account and bank statements. The Tribunal held that systemic inability of revenue systems to process an apparent error cannot prejudice the taxpayer and cannot justify sustaining an unjust demand. Consequently the rectification was ordered to be carried out by the assessing officer and the demand raised on the taxpayer was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
