Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the JAO to rectify the assessment u/s.154 and delete the demand. Tribunal found, on the basis of Form 26AS and a bank certificate, that the TDS was wrongly deducted under s.194A when funds were transferred from a CGAS account to a regular savings account; the bank conceded the error and records showed corresponding entries in the capital gains account and bank statements. The Tribunal held that systemic inability of revenue systems to process an apparent error cannot prejudice the taxpayer and cannot justify sustaining an unjust demand. Consequently the rectification was ordered to be carried out by the assessing officer and the demand raised on the taxpayer was quashed.
ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the JAO to rectify the assessment u/s.154 and delete the demand. Tribunal found, on the basis of Form 26AS and a bank certificate, that the TDS was wrongly deducted under s.194A when funds were transferred from a CGAS account to a regular savings account; the bank conceded the error and records showed corresponding entries in the capital gains account and bank statements. The Tribunal held that systemic inability of revenue systems to process an apparent error cannot prejudice the taxpayer and cannot justify sustaining an unjust demand. Consequently the rectification was ordered to be carried out by the assessing officer and the demand raised on the taxpayer was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
