Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC allowed the writ petition and held that, pursuant to the Principal Bench ruling, the tax authorities are entitled to exclude the period 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 when computing limitation under the relevant provisions, thereby entitling the petitioner to relief. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 16.08.2024 issued by the first respondent for the assessment year 2019-2020 is quashed. The matter is remitted to the first respondent for fresh adjudication on merits and in accordance with law, taking into account the exclusion of the specified period; no order as to costs.
The HC allowed the writ petition and held that, pursuant to the Principal Bench ruling, the tax authorities are entitled to exclude the period 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 when computing limitation under the relevant provisions, thereby entitling the petitioner to relief. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 16.08.2024 issued by the first respondent for the assessment year 2019-2020 is quashed. The matter is remitted to the first respondent for fresh adjudication on merits and in accordance with law, taking into account the exclusion of the specified period; no order as to costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
