Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC allowed the writ petition and held that, pursuant to the Principal Bench ruling, the tax authorities are entitled to exclude the period 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 when computing limitation under the relevant provisions, thereby entitling the petitioner to relief. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 16.08.2024 issued by the first respondent for the assessment year 2019-2020 is quashed. The matter is remitted to the first respondent for fresh adjudication on merits and in accordance with law, taking into account the exclusion of the specified period; no order as to costs.
The HC allowed the writ petition and held that, pursuant to the Principal Bench ruling, the tax authorities are entitled to exclude the period 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 when computing limitation under the relevant provisions, thereby entitling the petitioner to relief. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 16.08.2024 issued by the first respondent for the assessment year 2019-2020 is quashed. The matter is remitted to the first respondent for fresh adjudication on merits and in accordance with law, taking into account the exclusion of the specified period; no order as to costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
