Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld that the assessee is a charitable institution established under enabling metropolitan statutes and falls within "general public utility" under s.2(15), its registration u/s.12AA remaining valid. The Tribunal held the proviso to s.2(15) inapplicable and directed that exemption u/s.11 (and consequentially u/s.12) be allowed; Revenue's grounds challenging this (grounds nos.2, 3 and 5) were dismissed and the CIT(A)'s order sustained. Treatment of lease premium and TDRs as non-taxable for the relevant years, and the disallowance/ notional interest additions relating to public deposits/advances, were rendered academic in view of the exemption holding and prior Coordinate Bench rulings.
The ITAT upheld that the assessee is a charitable institution established under enabling metropolitan statutes and falls within "general public utility" under s.2(15), its registration u/s.12AA remaining valid. The Tribunal held the proviso to s.2(15) inapplicable and directed that exemption u/s.11 (and consequentially u/s.12) be allowed; Revenue's grounds challenging this (grounds nos.2, 3 and 5) were dismissed and the CIT(A)'s order sustained. Treatment of lease premium and TDRs as non-taxable for the relevant years, and the disallowance/ notional interest additions relating to public deposits/advances, were rendered academic in view of the exemption holding and prior Coordinate Bench rulings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.