<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee deemed charitable under s.2(15) as general public utility; s.12AA registration upheld, s.11 exemption allowed (15)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92126</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld that the assessee is a charitable institution established under enabling metropolitan statutes and falls within &quot;general public utility&quot; under s.2(15), its registration u/s.12AA remaining valid. The Tribunal held the proviso to s.2(15) inapplicable and directed that exemption u/s.11 (and consequentially u/s.12) be allowed; Revenue&#039;s grounds challenging this (grounds nos.2, 3 and 5) were dismissed and the CIT(A)&#039;s order sustained. Treatment of lease premium and TDRs as non-taxable for the relevant years, and the disallowance/ notional interest additions relating to public deposits/advances, were rendered academic in view of the exemption holding and prior Coordinate Bench rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee deemed charitable under s.2(15) as general public utility; s.12AA registration upheld, s.11 exemption allowed (15)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92126</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld that the assessee is a charitable institution established under enabling metropolitan statutes and falls within &quot;general public utility&quot; under s.2(15), its registration u/s.12AA remaining valid. The Tribunal held the proviso to s.2(15) inapplicable and directed that exemption u/s.11 (and consequentially u/s.12) be allowed; Revenue&#039;s grounds challenging this (grounds nos.2, 3 and 5) were dismissed and the CIT(A)&#039;s order sustained. Treatment of lease premium and TDRs as non-taxable for the relevant years, and the disallowance/ notional interest additions relating to public deposits/advances, were rendered academic in view of the exemption holding and prior Coordinate Bench rulings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>