Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT affirmed the inclusion of the differential between the Government stamp valuation and the declared sale consideration in the assessee's income under s. 43CA; the assessing officer had added the shortfall where the sale deed showed Rs. 45,00,000 against stamp valuation of Rs. 58,23,600, and CIT(A) confirmed the addition due to absence of any evidence of an appeal to the stamp valuation authority. The assessee's failure to adduce supporting material and non-appearance before the Tribunal resulted in the appellate relief being denied and the impugned addition upheld.
ITAT affirmed the inclusion of the differential between the Government stamp valuation and the declared sale consideration in the assessee's income under s. 43CA; the assessing officer had added the shortfall where the sale deed showed Rs. 45,00,000 against stamp valuation of Rs. 58,23,600, and CIT(A) confirmed the addition due to absence of any evidence of an appeal to the stamp valuation authority. The assessee's failure to adduce supporting material and non-appearance before the Tribunal resulted in the appellate relief being denied and the impugned addition upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.