Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT affirmed the inclusion of the differential between the Government stamp valuation and the declared sale consideration in the assessee's income under s. 43CA; the assessing officer had added the shortfall where the sale deed showed Rs. 45,00,000 against stamp valuation of Rs. 58,23,600, and CIT(A) confirmed the addition due to absence of any evidence of an appeal to the stamp valuation authority. The assessee's failure to adduce supporting material and non-appearance before the Tribunal resulted in the appellate relief being denied and the impugned addition upheld.
ITAT affirmed the inclusion of the differential between the Government stamp valuation and the declared sale consideration in the assessee's income under s. 43CA; the assessing officer had added the shortfall where the sale deed showed Rs. 45,00,000 against stamp valuation of Rs. 58,23,600, and CIT(A) confirmed the addition due to absence of any evidence of an appeal to the stamp valuation authority. The assessee's failure to adduce supporting material and non-appearance before the Tribunal resulted in the appellate relief being denied and the impugned addition upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
