Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition under section 56(2)(viib) relating to share premium by upholding the taxpayer's valuation under Rule 11UA. The Tribunal found the AO's contrary view rested on a misconstruction of the valuation methodology and that the valuation report had been correctly prepared; where shareholder net worth is the basis, liabilities need not be separately deducted, whereas if total assets are used liabilities must be excluded, yielding an equivalent net result. CIT(A) had properly appreciated facts and denied the Revenue an opportunity under Rule 46A was not shown to vitiate the adjudication. Accordingly, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition under section 56(2)(viib) relating to share premium by upholding the taxpayer's valuation under Rule 11UA. The Tribunal found the AO's contrary view rested on a misconstruction of the valuation methodology and that the valuation report had been correctly prepared; where shareholder net worth is the basis, liabilities need not be separately deducted, whereas if total assets are used liabilities must be excluded, yielding an equivalent net result. CIT(A) had properly appreciated facts and denied the Revenue an opportunity under Rule 46A was not shown to vitiate the adjudication. Accordingly, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.