Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition under section 56(2)(viib) relating to share premium by upholding the taxpayer's valuation under Rule 11UA. The Tribunal found the AO's contrary view rested on a misconstruction of the valuation methodology and that the valuation report had been correctly prepared; where shareholder net worth is the basis, liabilities need not be separately deducted, whereas if total assets are used liabilities must be excluded, yielding an equivalent net result. CIT(A) had properly appreciated facts and denied the Revenue an opportunity under Rule 46A was not shown to vitiate the adjudication. Accordingly, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
