Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the petitioner's writ insofar as it sought premature interference with the respondent's tax notice, holding that the petitioner failed to file the requisite reply to the impugned notice dated 18.03.2025 and thus cannot seek relief before the Court without exhausting the statutory process. The Court found that the petitioner bears the evidentiary burden to substantiate entitlement to the lower TDS rate where the seller's PAN was not linked to Aadhaar at the relevant time. The HC directed the Petitioner to file a substantive reply with supporting documents within two weeks of receipt of this order, and directed the Respondent to consider that reply and pass a decision expeditiously.
The HC dismissed the petitioner's writ insofar as it sought premature interference with the respondent's tax notice, holding that the petitioner failed to file the requisite reply to the impugned notice dated 18.03.2025 and thus cannot seek relief before the Court without exhausting the statutory process. The Court found that the petitioner bears the evidentiary burden to substantiate entitlement to the lower TDS rate where the seller's PAN was not linked to Aadhaar at the relevant time. The HC directed the Petitioner to file a substantive reply with supporting documents within two weeks of receipt of this order, and directed the Respondent to consider that reply and pass a decision expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
