Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeals, holding that receipts by a non-resident US corporate assessee from supply of end-user software licenses and related services do not constitute "royalty" taxable under the India-USA DTAA. The Tribunal found the license restricted copying, distribution, sublicensing, rent, source-code access and modification, and did not effect a transfer of copyright. The First Appellate Authority's detailed factual and legal analysis - applying the controlling Supreme Court ratio on software licensing and copyright transfer - was upheld as unassailed by any material demonstrating transfer of copyright. Consequently, the impugned demand was not sustained and the revenue's appeals were dismissed.
The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeals, holding that receipts by a non-resident US corporate assessee from supply of end-user software licenses and related services do not constitute "royalty" taxable under the India-USA DTAA. The Tribunal found the license restricted copying, distribution, sublicensing, rent, source-code access and modification, and did not effect a transfer of copyright. The First Appellate Authority's detailed factual and legal analysis - applying the controlling Supreme Court ratio on software licensing and copyright transfer - was upheld as unassailed by any material demonstrating transfer of copyright. Consequently, the impugned demand was not sustained and the revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.