<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue appeals dismissed: nonresident US company&#039;s end-user software license fees not &#039;royalty&#039; under India-US DTAA due to no copyright transfer</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92038</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, holding that receipts by a non-resident US corporate assessee from supply of end-user software licenses and related services do not constitute &quot;royalty&quot; taxable under the India-USA DTAA. The Tribunal found the license restricted copying, distribution, sublicensing, rent, source-code access and modification, and did not effect a transfer of copyright. The First Appellate Authority&#039;s detailed factual and legal analysis - applying the controlling Supreme Court ratio on software licensing and copyright transfer - was upheld as unassailed by any material demonstrating transfer of copyright. Consequently, the impugned demand was not sustained and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue appeals dismissed: nonresident US company&#039;s end-user software license fees not &#039;royalty&#039; under India-US DTAA due to no copyright transfer</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92038</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, holding that receipts by a non-resident US corporate assessee from supply of end-user software licenses and related services do not constitute &quot;royalty&quot; taxable under the India-USA DTAA. The Tribunal found the license restricted copying, distribution, sublicensing, rent, source-code access and modification, and did not effect a transfer of copyright. The First Appellate Authority&#039;s detailed factual and legal analysis - applying the controlling Supreme Court ratio on software licensing and copyright transfer - was upheld as unassailed by any material demonstrating transfer of copyright. Consequently, the impugned demand was not sustained and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:56:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>