Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudication, holding that the Belapur Commissionerate lacked jurisdiction to issue the SCN. The Tribunal found the appellants were duly registered and assessed for taxable cosmetic and surgical services under the Bhiwandi Commissionerate, and their Belapur "non-assessee" registration pertained solely to a different purpose and did not confer competence to initiate service tax proceedings. Consequently, actions taken by Belapur based solely on the non-assessee registration were without locus standi and unsustainable, and the confirmed demands in the impugned order were quashed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudication, holding that the Belapur Commissionerate lacked jurisdiction to issue the SCN. The Tribunal found the appellants were duly registered and assessed for taxable cosmetic and surgical services under the Bhiwandi Commissionerate, and their Belapur "non-assessee" registration pertained solely to a different purpose and did not confer competence to initiate service tax proceedings. Consequently, actions taken by Belapur based solely on the non-assessee registration were without locus standi and unsustainable, and the confirmed demands in the impugned order were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.