Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudication, holding that the Belapur Commissionerate lacked jurisdiction to issue the SCN. The Tribunal found the appellants were duly registered and assessed for taxable cosmetic and surgical services under the Bhiwandi Commissionerate, and their Belapur "non-assessee" registration pertained solely to a different purpose and did not confer competence to initiate service tax proceedings. Consequently, actions taken by Belapur based solely on the non-assessee registration were without locus standi and unsustainable, and the confirmed demands in the impugned order were quashed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudication, holding that the Belapur Commissionerate lacked jurisdiction to issue the SCN. The Tribunal found the appellants were duly registered and assessed for taxable cosmetic and surgical services under the Bhiwandi Commissionerate, and their Belapur "non-assessee" registration pertained solely to a different purpose and did not confer competence to initiate service tax proceedings. Consequently, actions taken by Belapur based solely on the non-assessee registration were without locus standi and unsustainable, and the confirmed demands in the impugned order were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
