Just a moment...
AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.
Launch AI Search →Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned adjudication, holding that the Belapur Commissionerate lacked jurisdiction to issue the SCN. The Tribunal found the appellants were duly registered and assessed for taxable cosmetic and surgical services under the Bhiwandi Commissionerate, and their Belapur 'non-assessee' registration pertained solely to a different purpose and did not confer competence to initiate service tax proceedings. Consequently, actions taken by Belapur based solely on the non-assessee registration were without locus standi and unsustainable, and the confirmed demands in the impugned order were quashed.