Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC affirmed the appellate authority's determination that the assessee's challenge to inclusion of two comparables was unsustainable where the comparables failed the prescribed 75% segment-revenue filter. The court held that, although segment-level financials may establish ALP where authentic and available, it is impermissible to circumvent an explicit selection filter by extracting segment figures when the comparable's relevant segment constitutes less than 75% of total revenue. Consequently the CIT(A)'s exclusion of those comparables stood unassailable and raised no substantial question of law. The assessment adjustment based on the remaining comparable set was thus upheld.
The HC affirmed the appellate authority's determination that the assessee's challenge to inclusion of two comparables was unsustainable where the comparables failed the prescribed 75% segment-revenue filter. The court held that, although segment-level financials may establish ALP where authentic and available, it is impermissible to circumvent an explicit selection filter by extracting segment figures when the comparable's relevant segment constitutes less than 75% of total revenue. Consequently the CIT(A)'s exclusion of those comparables stood unassailable and raised no substantial question of law. The assessment adjustment based on the remaining comparable set was thus upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.