<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee cannot bypass 75% segment-revenue filter by extracting small-segment figures; comparables excluded and adjustment upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92008</link>
    <description>The HC affirmed the appellate authority&#039;s determination that the assessee&#039;s challenge to inclusion of two comparables was unsustainable where the comparables failed the prescribed 75% segment-revenue filter. The court held that, although segment-level financials may establish ALP where authentic and available, it is impermissible to circumvent an explicit selection filter by extracting segment figures when the comparable&#039;s relevant segment constitutes less than 75% of total revenue. Consequently the CIT(A)&#039;s exclusion of those comparables stood unassailable and raised no substantial question of law. The assessment adjustment based on the remaining comparable set was thus upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=846390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee cannot bypass 75% segment-revenue filter by extracting small-segment figures; comparables excluded and adjustment upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92008</link>
      <description>The HC affirmed the appellate authority&#039;s determination that the assessee&#039;s challenge to inclusion of two comparables was unsustainable where the comparables failed the prescribed 75% segment-revenue filter. The court held that, although segment-level financials may establish ALP where authentic and available, it is impermissible to circumvent an explicit selection filter by extracting segment figures when the comparable&#039;s relevant segment constitutes less than 75% of total revenue. Consequently the CIT(A)&#039;s exclusion of those comparables stood unassailable and raised no substantial question of law. The assessment adjustment based on the remaining comparable set was thus upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:32:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>