Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC affirmed the appellate authority's determination that the assessee's challenge to inclusion of two comparables was unsustainable where the comparables failed the prescribed 75% segment-revenue filter. The court held that, although segment-level financials may establish ALP where authentic and available, it is impermissible to circumvent an explicit selection filter by extracting segment figures when the comparable's relevant segment constitutes less than 75% of total revenue. Consequently the CIT(A)'s exclusion of those comparables stood unassailable and raised no substantial question of law. The assessment adjustment based on the remaining comparable set was thus upheld.
The HC affirmed the appellate authority's determination that the assessee's challenge to inclusion of two comparables was unsustainable where the comparables failed the prescribed 75% segment-revenue filter. The court held that, although segment-level financials may establish ALP where authentic and available, it is impermissible to circumvent an explicit selection filter by extracting segment figures when the comparable's relevant segment constitutes less than 75% of total revenue. Consequently the CIT(A)'s exclusion of those comparables stood unassailable and raised no substantial question of law. The assessment adjustment based on the remaining comparable set was thus upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.