Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of the Respondent's regular bail in a PMLA prosecution concerning proceeds of crime and alleged abuse of office. The court held that the risk of witness influence had been addressed by the Special Judge when granting bail, since the key witness's statement was recorded while the Respondent remained in custody. The principal co-accused (Accused 1) had been charged and granted bail earlier, diminishing any realistic capacity of the Respondent to influence authorities. The Respondent had suffered cancellation of anticipatory bail, undergone judicial custody, cooperated with investigation, and no subsequent breach of bail conditions was alleged; accordingly the petition lacked merit and was dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of the Respondent's regular bail in a PMLA prosecution concerning proceeds of crime and alleged abuse of office. The court held that the risk of witness influence had been addressed by the Special Judge when granting bail, since the key witness's statement was recorded while the Respondent remained in custody. The principal co-accused (Accused 1) had been charged and granted bail earlier, diminishing any realistic capacity of the Respondent to influence authorities. The Respondent had suffered cancellation of anticipatory bail, undergone judicial custody, cooperated with investigation, and no subsequent breach of bail conditions was alleged; accordingly the petition lacked merit and was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
