Bail cancellation requires post-release misuse of liberty; speculative fears of interference are insufficient once investigation has progressed.

Regular bail in a money-laundering case should not be cancelled merely because serious allegations remain pending; cancellation requires post-release misuse of liberty or other supervening circumstances. Where the witness statement had already been recorded, the accused remained in judicial custody during investigation, the supplementary complaint had been filed, and the material had crystallised before bail was granted, the apprehended risk of tampering or interference was treated as substantially addressed. In the absence of any post-bail conduct showing abuse of liberty, the request to cancel bail was rejected and the bail order was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the regular bail granted to the respondent in a money-laundering case should be cancelled on the grounds of alleged tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses, and apprehended interference with the investigation.

Analysis: The anticipatory bail had earlier been cancelled on allegations of attempted influence, but by the time regular bail was granted the concerned witness's statement had already been recorded and the respondent had remained in judicial custody while the investigation was completed against her. The supplementary complaint had been filed, the material against the respondent had crystallised, and no post-bail conduct or supervening circumstance showing misuse of liberty was placed on record. Cancellation of bail cannot rest merely on the gravity of allegations or on speculative apprehension once the apprehended prejudice has been addressed in the course of investigation.

Conclusion: The request to cancel the regular bail was rejected, and the bail order was upheld in favour of the respondent.

Final Conclusion: The petition seeking interference with the bail order failed, and the respondent's liberty on regular bail remained undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Bail already granted should not be cancelled in the absence of post-release misuse of liberty or other supervening circumstances, especially where the apprehended risks to witnesses or investigation have been substantially addressed before the grant of bail.

---