Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's transfer pricing challenges in part....
Transfer pricing appeals partly allowed; specified comparables excluded or remitted, some included; s.234A interest disallowed, recompute tax and refund
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's transfer pricing challenges in part. Two specified comparables were excluded from the final set on the basis of identical FAR findings in prior co-ordinate bench decisions; one specified reseller comparable was held comparable and included. Several other comparables engaged in trading were remitted to the AO/TPO for fresh verification against prescribed filters and segmental reporting. The Tribunal excluded multiple education-service comparables for functional dissimilarity, remitted others for verification of segmental revenues, and included one education comparable. Several software-development comparables were excluded, while a specific IT services comparable qualified for inclusion; additional IT comparables were directed to be examined against FAR for AYs 2020-21 and 2021-22. Working capital adjustments and proportionate adjustments were allowed; interest under s.234A was disallowed and the AO was directed to recompute tax/refund accordingly.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's transfer pricing challenges in part. Two specified comparables were excluded from the final set on the basis of identical FAR findings in prior co-ordinate bench decisions; one specified reseller comparable was held comparable and included. Several other comparables engaged in trading were remitted to the AO/TPO for fresh verification against prescribed filters and segmental reporting. The Tribunal excluded multiple education-service comparables for functional dissimilarity, remitted others for verification of segmental revenues, and included one education comparable. Several software-development comparables were excluded, while a specific IT services comparable qualified for inclusion; additional IT comparables were directed to be examined against FAR for AYs 2020-21 and 2021-22. Working capital adjustments and proportionate adjustments were allowed; interest under s.234A was disallowed and the AO was directed to recompute tax/refund accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.