<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing appeals partly allowed; specified comparables excluded or remitted, some included; s.234A interest disallowed, recompute tax and refund</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91927</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the taxpayer&#039;s transfer pricing challenges in part. Two specified comparables were excluded from the final set on the basis of identical FAR findings in prior co-ordinate bench decisions; one specified reseller comparable was held comparable and included. Several other comparables engaged in trading were remitted to the AO/TPO for fresh verification against prescribed filters and segmental reporting. The Tribunal excluded multiple education-service comparables for functional dissimilarity, remitted others for verification of segmental revenues, and included one education comparable. Several software-development comparables were excluded, while a specific IT services comparable qualified for inclusion; additional IT comparables .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:41:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:41:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing appeals partly allowed; specified comparables excluded or remitted, some included; s.234A interest disallowed, recompute tax and refund</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91927</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the taxpayer&#039;s transfer pricing challenges in part. Two specified comparables were excluded from the final set on the basis of identical FAR findings in prior co-ordinate bench decisions; one specified reseller comparable was held comparable and included. Several other comparables engaged in trading were remitted to the AO/TPO for fresh verification against prescribed filters and segmental reporting. The Tribunal excluded multiple education-service comparables for functional dissimilarity, remitted others for verification of segmental revenues, and included one education comparable. Several software-development comparables were excluded, while a specific IT services comparable qualified for inclusion; additional IT comparables .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:41:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>