Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's transfer pricing challenges in part....
Transfer pricing appeals partly allowed; specified comparables excluded or remitted, some included; s.234A interest disallowed, recompute tax and refund
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's transfer pricing challenges in part. Two specified comparables were excluded from the final set on the basis of identical FAR findings in prior co-ordinate bench decisions; one specified reseller comparable was held comparable and included. Several other comparables engaged in trading were remitted to the AO/TPO for fresh verification against prescribed filters and segmental reporting. The Tribunal excluded multiple education-service comparables for functional dissimilarity, remitted others for verification of segmental revenues, and included one education comparable. Several software-development comparables were excluded, while a specific IT services comparable qualified for inclusion; additional IT comparables were directed to be examined against FAR for AYs 2020-21 and 2021-22. Working capital adjustments and proportionate adjustments were allowed; interest under s.234A was disallowed and the AO was directed to recompute tax/refund accordingly.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's transfer pricing challenges in part. Two specified comparables were excluded from the final set on the basis of identical FAR findings in prior co-ordinate bench decisions; one specified reseller comparable was held comparable and included. Several other comparables engaged in trading were remitted to the AO/TPO for fresh verification against prescribed filters and segmental reporting. The Tribunal excluded multiple education-service comparables for functional dissimilarity, remitted others for verification of segmental revenues, and included one education comparable. Several software-development comparables were excluded, while a specific IT services comparable qualified for inclusion; additional IT comparables were directed to be examined against FAR for AYs 2020-21 and 2021-22. Working capital adjustments and proportionate adjustments were allowed; interest under s.234A was disallowed and the AO was directed to recompute tax/refund accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.