TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194A. The Tribunal held that payments made to the transferor entities for acquisition of ICDs, NCDs and term loans, including accrued interest up to the date of transfer, constituted lump-sum purchase consideration for capital assets and did not amount to "interest" payable by the assessee. Consequently, no borrower-lender relationship arose between the parties and the assessee was not in default within the meaning of sections 201(1)/201(1A). The appellate authority's finding that no obligation to deduct TDS under section 194A existed was affirmed.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194A. The Tribunal held that payments made to the transferor entities for acquisition of ICDs, NCDs and term loans, including accrued interest up to the date of transfer, constituted lump-sum purchase consideration for capital assets and did not amount to "interest" payable by the assessee. Consequently, no borrower-lender relationship arose between the parties and the assessee was not in default within the meaning of sections 201(1)/201(1A). The appellate authority's finding that no obligation to deduct TDS under section 194A existed was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.