<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payments for ICDs, NCDs and term loans treated as lump-sum capital consideration; no TDS liability under section 194A, 201(1)/201(1A)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91926</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194A. The Tribunal held that payments made to the transferor entities for acquisition of ICDs, NCDs and term loans, including accrued interest up to the date of transfer, constituted lump-sum purchase consideration for capital assets and did not amount to &quot;interest&quot; payable by the assessee. Consequently, no borrower-lender relationship arose between the parties and the assessee was not in default within the meaning of sections 201(1)/201(1A). The appellate authority&#039;s finding that no obligation to deduct TDS under section 194A existed was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:41:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:41:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payments for ICDs, NCDs and term loans treated as lump-sum capital consideration; no TDS liability under section 194A, 201(1)/201(1A)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91926</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194A. The Tribunal held that payments made to the transferor entities for acquisition of ICDs, NCDs and term loans, including accrued interest up to the date of transfer, constituted lump-sum purchase consideration for capital assets and did not amount to &quot;interest&quot; payable by the assessee. Consequently, no borrower-lender relationship arose between the parties and the assessee was not in default within the meaning of sections 201(1)/201(1A). The appellate authority&#039;s finding that no obligation to deduct TDS under section 194A existed was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 08:41:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>