Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the Code to entertain and adjudicate the IA enforcing the arbitral award against the Corporate Debtor. The arbitral award is final and unchallenged; the Resolution Professional is entitled to prosecute enforcement for revival of the Corporate Debtor, and the Adjudicating Authority may direct the judgment-debtor to pay the award sum. The tribunal affirmed that the IBC's time-bound regime prevails and that alleged delay in issuing the award vis-Ã -vis the MSME Act's 90-day aspiration does not vitiate the award or preclude enforcement. Consequently, the impugned order was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the Code to entertain and adjudicate the IA enforcing the arbitral award against the Corporate Debtor. The arbitral award is final and unchallenged; the Resolution Professional is entitled to prosecute enforcement for revival of the Corporate Debtor, and the Adjudicating Authority may direct the judgment-debtor to pay the award sum. The tribunal affirmed that the IBC's time-bound regime prevails and that alleged delay in issuing the award vis-Ã -vis the MSME Act's 90-day aspiration does not vitiate the award or preclude enforcement. Consequently, the impugned order was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
