Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the impugned direction conditioning stay of the disputed tax demand on payment of 20% was unsustainable and granted an unconditional stay of the demand pending appellate proceedings. The court found that CIT(A) and ITAT had already held there was no chargeability to capital gains in respect of the converted godown, and those appellate orders - not being stayed - are binding on the Revenue. Applying principles of judicial discipline, the HC held the reopening lacked a sustainable basis in light of prior ITAT orders and affirmed that subordinate revenue authorities cannot ignore binding appellate decisions; accordingly the conditional payment requirement was set aside.
The HC held that the impugned direction conditioning stay of the disputed tax demand on payment of 20% was unsustainable and granted an unconditional stay of the demand pending appellate proceedings. The court found that CIT(A) and ITAT had already held there was no chargeability to capital gains in respect of the converted godown, and those appellate orders - not being stayed - are binding on the Revenue. Applying principles of judicial discipline, the HC held the reopening lacked a sustainable basis in light of prior ITAT orders and affirmed that subordinate revenue authorities cannot ignore binding appellate decisions; accordingly the conditional payment requirement was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
