https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91860 The HC held that the impugned direction conditioning stay of the disputed tax demand on payment of 20% was unsustainable and granted an unconditional stay of the demand pending appellate proceedings. The court found that CIT(A) and ITAT had already held there was no chargeability to capital gains in respect of the converted godown, and those appellate orders - not being stayed - are binding on the Revenue. Applying principles of judicial discipline, the HC held the reopening lacked a sustainable basis in light of prior ITAT orders and affirmed that subordinate revenue authorities cannot ignore binding appellate decisions; accordingly the conditional payment requirement was set aside. en-us Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530 Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91860 The HC held that the impugned direction conditioning stay of the disputed tax demand on payment of 20% was unsustainable and granted an unconditional stay of the demand pending appellate proceedings. The court found that CIT(A) and ITAT had already held there was no chargeability to capital gains in respect of the converted godown, and those appellate orders - not being stayed - are binding on the Revenue. Applying principles of judicial discipline, the HC held the reopening lacked a sustainable basis in light of prior ITAT orders and affirmed that subordinate revenue authorities cannot ignore binding appellate decisions; accordingly the conditional payment requirement was set aside. Highlights Income Tax Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:31:25 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91860